Autarchy of the Private Cave

Tiny bits of bioinformatics, [web-]programming etc

    • Archives

    • Recent comments

    Archive for February 28th, 2016

    How to: export only notes to PDF from LibreOffice Impress 5

    28th February 2016

    If you want to export Notes to a PDF from LibreOffice Impress 5,
    and dutifully set the appropriate checkbox in PDF export dialog,
    then you will get all slides twice: first just all the slides as with usual PDF export, and then all the Notes pages.

    There is an easy solution to get Notes-only without editing the PDF.

    If you have a PDf printer installed (most Linux distributions, and Windows 10), just do File -> Print from Impress,
    then under the Print sub-header choose Notes from the Document drop-down (see picture).
    Make sure to set the proper paper format for the PDF printer (A4 in my case).
    Then print, and save the resulting PDF.
    Read the rest of this entry »


    Posted in how-to, Notepad, Software | No Comments »

    Preprint servers and open journals

    28th February 2016

    Let’s start with some definitions.

    With Open Journals I’m referring to open/public peer-review journals.
    With preprint servers, I’m referring to services which allow you to publish your manuscript with a DOI, for pre-submission interest and feedback collection.

    I am aware of the following public peer-review journals:

    • F1000 Research: your submission is made public without any editorial pre-screening within an average of 7 days, but only gets indexed in PubMed/Scopus/Scholar after a successful public peer review. Public means that a reviewer-signed evaluation appears together with the submitted manuscript. Authors may respond to criticism, and upload revisions of their submission. I believe a submission passes peer review after two positive reviews. Note that even your initial submission receives a DOI, and is thus citable (as well as all subsequent revisions). Brief examination of articles in some of the topics tells me that F1000 Research is a good place to publish, esp. because it is a kind of pre-print + journal in one package. You pay per-submission, there are 3 tiers by word count.
    • The Winnower: submit-review-revise, but here you pay for the DOI after your submission is reviewed. Before review your submission is thus not citable (except for by URL, which isn’t tracked as easily as DOI references). I haven’t formed an opinion on how attractive the winnower is for submitting, but I did find this quite interesting story for you to enjoy :)
    • Science Open: this project encompasses 5 mostly medical journals. It lists over 11 million articles on the front page, but those are sourced from other publications; Science Open itself seems to have several hundred publications across all 5 journals. Submissions get a DOI, then can undergo public review. It is not clear to me in which direction Science Open will be moving – towards becoming an excellent research papers aggregator, or towards becoming a publishing platform, or – like now – towards both.

    I’m also aware of the following preprint servers:
    Read the rest of this entry »


    Posted in Science | No Comments »